Keycloak: Open redirect when using wildcard valid redirect URIs in Keycloak
CVE-2026-7504GHSA-rp95-xpg9-c2cq
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (org.keycloak:keycloak-services 26.6.2), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Maven org.keycloak:keycloak-services
- Affected
- < 26.6.2
- Fixed in
- 26.6.2
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rp95-xpg9-c2cq lists affected ranges: Maven org.keycloak:keycloak-services >=0 <26.6.2
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-7504: 0.50% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 42.87 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
A flaw was found in Keycloak's URL validation logic during redirect operations. By crafting a malicious request, an attacker could bypass validation to redirect users to unauthorized URLs, potentially leading to the exposure of sensitive information within the domain or facilitating further attacks. This vulnerability specifically affects Keycloak clients configured with a wildcard () in the "Valid Redirect URIs" field and requires user interaction to be successfully exploited. The issue stems from a discrepancy in how Keycloak and the underlying Java URI implementation handle the user-info component of a URL. If a malicious redirect URL is constructed using multiple @ characters in the user-info section, Java's URI parser fails to extract the user-info, leaving only the raw authority field. Consequently, Keycloak's validation check fails to detect the malformed user-info, falls back to a wildcard comparison, and incorrectly permits the malicious redirect.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-rp95-xpg9-c2cq
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-7504 Advisory: Keycloak: Open redirect when using wildcard valid redirect URIs in Keycloak IDs: CVE-2026-7504, GHSA-rp95-xpg9-c2cq Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-7504 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 16:45 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.1) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: org.keycloak:keycloak-services 26.6.2. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Maven org.keycloak:keycloak-services: affected < 26.6.2; fixed in 26.6.2 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Maven org.keycloak:keycloak-services: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on org.keycloak:keycloak-services. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rp95-xpg9-c2cq (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rp95-xpg9-c2cq lists affected ranges: Maven org.keycloak:keycloak-services >=0 <26.6.2) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…