RunGptLLM class in LlamaIndex has a command injection

Exploitation

No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.

CVSS

8.8 · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS

• CVE-2024-4181: 2.14% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 82.03 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the RunGptLLM class of the llamaindex library, version 0.9.47, used by the RunGpt framework from JinaAI to connect to Language Learning Models (LLMs). The vulnerability arises from the improper use of the eval function, allowing a malicious or compromised LLM hosting provider to execute arbitrary commands on the client's machine. This issue was fixed in version 0.10.13. The exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to a hosting provider gaining full control over client machines.

Published by the source

16 May 2024, 09:33 UTC

Last modified by the source

13 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC

Source last checked

26 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC

1. Revision 2 · amended · 26 Oct 2026

   Amended from ghsa record GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch

2. Revision 1 · created · 24 Oct 2026

   Published from osv record GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2024-4181

Advisory: RunGptLLM class in LlamaIndex has a command injection
IDs: CVE-2024-4181, GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2024-4181 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: High (CVSS 8.8)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: llama-index 0.10.13; llama-index-llms-rungpt 0.1.3. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI llama-index: affected < 0.10.13; fixed in 0.10.13
- PyPI llama-index-llms-rungpt: affected < 0.1.3; fixed in 0.1.3

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show llama-index`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.
- `python -m pip show llama-index-llms-rungpt`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on llama-index, llama-index-llms-rungpt.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch (OSV record GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch lists affected ranges: PyPI llama-index >=0 =0 <0.1.3 (fixed))
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pw38-xv9x-h8ch lists affected ranges: PyPI llama-index >=0 =0 <0.1.3)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.