Skip to content

← Public intelligence

Maven package

org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-office-viewer

Open actionable advisories and recorded vendor fixes. This public package view has no inventory attached and cannot establish whether your deployment is affected. A vendor fix never resolves your finding; verify your installed version and the source guidance.

Open advisories

1 actionable advisory, newest first. Withdrawn advisories and news are excluded. Coverage is partial.

  1. High, CVSS 7.5MavenPublished

    Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-office-viewer

    CVE-2023-29517 · GHSA-m3c3-9qj7-7xmx

    Affected
    • Maven org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-office-viewer >= 2.5-milestone-2, < 13.10.11; >= 14.0-rc-1, < 14.4.8; >= 14.5, < 14.10.1
    Fixed in
    13.10.1114.10.114.4.8· Vendor fix available
    Issue
    Impact The office document viewer macro was allowing anyone to see any file content from the hosting server, provided that the office server was connected and depending on the permissions of the user running the servlet engine (e.g. tomcat) running XWiki. The same vulnerability also allowed to perform internal requests to resources from the hosting server. Patches The problem has been patched in XWiki 13.10.11, 14.10.1, 14.4.8, 15.0-rc-1. Workarounds It might be possible to workaround this vulnerability by running XWiki in a sandbox with a user with very low privileges on the machine, now to run a servlet engine the user will always need access to some files, so in any case this workaround won't protect all files to be accessed. References Original jira ticket: https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-20447 Jira ticket related to another exploit using same root cause: https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-20324 Jira ticket related to the possibility to exploit the same vulnerability to…

    Recommended action: Upgrade to 14.10.1, 14.4.8 or 13.10.11 by release line, then redeploy and verify.A vendor fix does not resolve your finding until you verify it in your own systems.

    Sources:github.comSource checked Evidence →