Rejected authentication challenges can poison the Key Vault scope cache
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (azure_security_keyvault_certificates 1.1.0-beta.2, 1.0.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
crates.io azure_security_keyvault_certificates
- Affected
- >= 0.9.0, < 1.0.1>= 1.1.0-beta.0, < 1.1.0-beta.2
- Fixed in
- 1.1.0-beta.2, 1.0.1
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record RUSTSEC-2026-0437 lists affected ranges: crates.io azure_security_keyvault_certificates >=0.9.0 =1.1.0-beta.0 <1.1.0-beta.2 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; not marked as GitHub-reviewed.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Affected versions of `KeyVaultAuthorizer::on_challenge` cache the authentication scope from a `WWW-Authenticate` response before verifying that the challenge resource matches the requested endpoint. When verification rejects the challenge, the scope remains cached. A subsequent request through the same client uses that scope to authorize the request without repeating challenge resource verification. For `azure_security_keyvault_certificates`, the affected versions are `0.9.0` through `1.0.0`, inclusive, and `1.1.0-beta.1`. Versions before `0.9.0` do not use this challenge-scope cache and are unaffected by this issue.
Impact An application that sends requests to an attacker-controlled endpoint and reuses the same client after a rejected challenge can disclose a bearer token and request body to that endpoint, if its credential can obtain a token for the supplied scope. The first request's validation error therefore does not prevent disclosure on a later request. Changing the request…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record RUSTSEC-2026-0437
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: rustsec-2026-0437 Advisory: Rejected authentication challenges can poison the Key Vault scope cache IDs: rustsec-2026-0437 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/rustsec-2026-0437 (revision 1, source checked 6 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: azure_security_keyvault_certificates 1.1.0-beta.2, 1.0.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - crates.io azure_security_keyvault_certificates: affected >= 0.9.0, < 1.0.1; >= 1.1.0-beta.0, < 1.1.0-beta.2; fixed in 1.1.0-beta.2, 1.0.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - crates.io azure_security_keyvault_certificates: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on azure_security_keyvault_certificates. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/RUSTSEC-2026-0437 (OSV record RUSTSEC-2026-0437 lists affected ranges: crates.io azure_security_keyvault_certificates >=0.9.0 =1.1.0-beta.0 <1.1.0-beta.2 (fixed)) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…