Skip to content

← Actionable
Unrated

durabletask 1.4.1, 1.4.2, and 1.4.3 contain malicious code distributed via a compromised maintainer account

What to do

Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • PyPI durabletask

    Affected
    >= 1.4.1, <= 1.4.1>= 1.4.2, <= 1.4.2>= 1.4.3, <= 1.4.3
    Fixed in
    no fixed version recorded

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
not scored
EPSS
No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

`durabletask` versions 1.4.1, 1.4.2, and 1.4.3 were published on 2026-05-19 within a 35-minute window through a compromised PyPI maintainer account and contained malicious code. On import, the package fetched a remote payload (`rope.pyz`) from an attacker-controlled host and executed it. The payload was a credential-theft framework that interrogated cloud instance metadata (AWS/Azure/GCP) and secret stores, harvested Kubernetes service-account tokens, HashiCorp Vault tokens, and credentials from known filesystem paths, attempted to brute-force password manager vaults. Anything obtained was exfiltrated to command-and-control infrastructure with a GitHub dead-drop fallback. It established persistence via a systemd unit (`pgsql-monitor.service`) and included a geo-targeted destructive wiper. Indicators of compromise: - Dropped payload: rope.pyz (sha256 069ac1dc7f7649b76bc72a11ac700f373804bfd81dab7e561157b703999f44ce) - Primary C2: check.git-service[.]com (160.119.64.3) - Secondary C2:…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record PYSEC-2026-207

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: pysec-2026-207

Advisory: durabletask 1.4.1, 1.4.2, and 1.4.3 contain malicious code distributed via a compromised maintainer account
IDs: pysec-2026-207
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/pysec-2026-207 (revision 1, source checked 24 Oct 2026, 04:13 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Unrated
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- PyPI durabletask: affected >= 1.4.1, <= 1.4.1; >= 1.4.2, <= 1.4.2; >= 1.4.3, <= 1.4.3

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `python -m pip show durabletask`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active.

## Supported action
No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on durabletask.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-207 (OSV record PYSEC-2026-207 lists affected ranges: PyPI durabletask >=1.4.1 =1.4.2 =1.4.3 <=1.4.3)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…