Malicious code in litellm (PyPI)
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI litellm
- Affected
- >= 1.82.7, <= 1.82.7>= 1.82.8, <= 1.82.8>= 1.107.0, <= 1.107.0
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record PYSEC-2026-2 lists affected ranges: PyPI litellm >=1.82.7 <=1.82.8
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; not marked as GitHub-reviewed.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record MAL-2026-2144 lists affected ranges: PyPI litellm >=1.82.7 =1.82.8 =1.107.0 <=1.107.0
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; not marked as GitHub-reviewed.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
litellm 1.107.0, uploaded to PyPI on 2026-10-21 between 11:39 and 11:40 UTC, contains a credential stealer and a remote code execution backdoor that are not in the upstream source (the v1.107.0 git tag of BerriAI/litellm does not contain them): they were injected at build or upload time. Every wheel ships three extra files under litellm-1.107.0.data/purelib/, which pip installs at the site-packages root, so the payload is triggered at every Python interpreter start, without importing litellm. - cook.pth contains `import cook`. - cook.py runs `exec(zlib.decompress(base64.b64decode(...)))`, an info stealer (self-named "privcollect") that collects browser passwords and history, SSH keys, shell history, AWS/GCP/Azure credentials and cloud instance metadata (169.254.169.254, 169.254.170.2), Kubernetes, Docker, Vault and CI secrets, AI developer tool configurations (~/.cursor, ~/.claude, ~/.kiro, Windsurf), GPG and TLS private keys, .npmrc, .pypirc, .git-credentials and environment…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record MAL-2026-2144
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record PYSEC-2026-2
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: pysec-2026-2 Advisory: Malicious code in litellm (PyPI) IDs: pysec-2026-2 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/pysec-2026-2 (revision 2, source checked 30 Oct 2026, 06:40 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI litellm: affected >= 1.82.7, <= 1.82.7; >= 1.82.8, <= 1.82.8; >= 1.107.0, <= 1.107.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show litellm`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on litellm. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-2 (OSV record PYSEC-2026-2 lists affected ranges: PyPI litellm >=1.82.7 <=1.82.8) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/MAL-2026-2144 (OSV record MAL-2026-2144 lists affected ranges: PyPI litellm >=1.82.7 =1.82.8 =1.107.0 <=1.107.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…