github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx vulnerable to Potential Padding Oracle Attack
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2 2.0.11; github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx 1.2.26), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2
- Affected
- <= 2.0.10
- Fixed in
- 2.0.11
- Affected
- <= 1.2.25
- Fixed in
- 1.2.26
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq lists affected ranges: Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2 >=0 =0 <=1.2.25
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Decrypting AES-CBC encrypted JWE has Potential Padding Oracle Attack Vulnerability. Details On v2.0.10, decrypting AES-CBC encrypted JWE may return an error "failed to generate plaintext from decrypted blocks: invalid padding": https://github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/blob/8840ffd4afc5839f591ff0e9ba9034af52b1643e/jwe/internal/aescbc/aescbc.go#L210-L213 Reporting padding error causes Padding Oracle Attack Vulnerability. RFC 7516 JSON Web Encryption (JWE) says that we MUST NOT do this. 11.5. Timing Attacks To mitigate the attacks described in RFC 3218 [RFC3218], the recipient MUST NOT distinguish between format, padding, and length errors of encrypted keys. It is strongly recommended, in the event of receiving an improperly formatted key, that the recipient substitute a randomly generated CEK and proceed to the next step, to mitigate timing attacks. In addition, the time to remove padding depends on the length of the padding. It may leak the length of the padding by Timing Attacks.…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq Advisory: github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx vulnerable to Potential Padding Oracle Attack IDs: GHSA-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:58 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2 2.0.11; github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx 1.2.26. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2: affected <= 2.0.10; fixed in 2.0.11 - Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx: affected <= 1.2.25; fixed in 1.2.26 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2: check the installed version with your package manager. - Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2, github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rm8v-mxj3-5rmq lists affected ranges: Go github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2 >=0 =0 <=1.2.25) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…