pypqc private key retrieval vulnerability
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (pypqc 0.0.6.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI pypqc
- Affected
- >= 0.0.4, < 0.0.6.1
- Fixed in
- 0.0.6.1
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 lists affected ranges: PyPI pypqc >=0.0.4 <0.0.6.1 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 lists affected ranges: PyPI pypqc >=0.0.4 <0.0.6.1
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.2 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact kyber512, kyber768, and kyber1024 only: An attacker able to submit many decapsulation requests against a single private key, and to gain timing information about the decapsulation, could recover the private key. Proof-of-concept exploit exists for a local attacker. CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C Patches Version 0.0.6.1 and newer of PyPQC is patched. Workarounds No workarounds have been reported. The 0.0.6 - 0.0.6.1 upgrade should be a drop-in replacement; it has no known breaking changes. References Timeline 1. Cryspen researchers privately reported KyberSlash to the reference implementation maintainers. 2. Peter Schwabe partially patched KyberSlash \(only "KyberSlash 1"\) in the reference implementation on December 1st, 2023, but did not document or advertise this as a security patch. https://www.github.com/pq-crystals/kyber/commit/dda29cc63af721981ee2c831cf00822e69be3220 3. Daniel J. Bernstein publicly reported KyberSlash as a security issue on…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 Advisory: pypqc private key retrieval vulnerability IDs: GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-rc4p-p3j9-6577 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.2) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: pypqc 0.0.6.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI pypqc: affected >= 0.0.4, < 0.0.6.1; fixed in 0.0.6.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show pypqc`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on pypqc. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 (OSV record GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 lists affected ranges: PyPI pypqc >=0.0.4 <0.0.6.1 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rc4p-p3j9-6577 lists affected ranges: PyPI pypqc >=0.0.4 <0.0.6.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…