CSRF tokens leaked in URL by canned query form
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (datasette 0.46), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI datasette
- Affected
- < 0.46
- Fixed in
- 0.46
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw lists affected ranges: PyPI datasette >=0 <0.46 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw lists affected ranges: PyPI datasette >=0 <0.46
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 4.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact The HTML form for a read-only canned query includes the hidden CSRF token field added in #798 for writable canned queries (#698). This means that submitting those read-only forms exposes the CSRF token in the URL - for example on https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/neighborhoodsearch submitting the form took me to: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/neighborhoodsearch?text=down&csrftoken=CSRFTOKEN-HERE This token could potentially leak to an attacker if the resulting page has a link to an external site on it and the user clicks the link, since the token would be exposed in the referral logs. Patches A fix for this issue has been released in Datasette 0.46. Workarounds You can fix this issue in a Datasette instance without upgrading by copying the 0.46 query.html template into a custom templates/ directory and running Datasette with the --template-dir=templates/ option. References Issue 918 discusses this in details: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/918 For more…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw Advisory: CSRF tokens leaked in URL by canned query form IDs: GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-q6j3-c4wc-63vw (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:08 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 4.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: datasette 0.46. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI datasette: affected < 0.46; fixed in 0.46 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show datasette`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on datasette. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw (OSV record GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw lists affected ranges: PyPI datasette >=0 <0.46 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-q6j3-c4wc-63vw lists affected ranges: PyPI datasette >=0 <0.46) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…