Sandbox Breakout / Arbitrary Code Execution in @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
npm @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm
- Affected
- every version
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc lists affected ranges: npm @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm >=0.0.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc lists affected ranges: npm @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm >=0.0.0
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
All versions of @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm are vulnerable to Sandbox Escape leading to Remote Code Execution. The package fails to restrict access to the main context through this.constructor.constructor . This may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code in the system. Evaluating the payload this.constructor.constructor('return process.env')() prints the contents of process.env. Recommendation No fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative package until a fix is made available.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc Advisory: Sandbox Breakout / Arbitrary Code Execution in @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm IDs: GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-jp99-5h8w-gmxc (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm: affected every version ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc lists affected ranges: npm @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm >=0.0.0) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc (OSV record GHSA-jp99-5h8w-gmxc lists affected ranges: npm @zhaoyao91/eval-in-vm >=0.0.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…