Pocket ID has a reauthentication bypass via one-time access token login — passkey step-up requirement defeated by JWT freshness check that accepts any login method
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend 0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend
- Affected
- < 0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe
- Fixed in
- 0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend >=0 <0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GO-2026-6117 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend >=0 <0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; not marked as GitHub-reviewed.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend >=0 <0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 6.0 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Reauthentication Bypass via One-Time Access Token Login Summary A weaker authentication method (OTA token or signup token) is accepted as passkey step-up proof, yielding unauthorized renewable 30-day OIDC refresh tokens for clients explicitly configured with RequiresReauthentication: true. The POST /api/webauthn/reauthenticate endpoint's access-token fallback checks only JWT freshness (IssuedAt within 60 seconds), not the authentication method used. The session cookie gate is also non-validating -- any arbitrary cookie value (e.g. session=deadbeef) is accepted, collapsing the reauth boundary to token recency alone. The bypass needs to succeed only once. The resulting OIDC grant includes a 30-day refresh token that can be rotated indefinitely, providing persistent victim-impersonation access to the protected downstream service. The attacker obtains accesstoken (1-hour TTL), idtoken (victim's name, email, profile), and refreshtoken (30-day TTL, renewable) for a client that was…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 4 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GO-2026-6117
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 Advisory: Pocket ID has a reauthentication bypass via one-time access token login — passkey step-up requirement defeated by JWT freshness check that accepts any login method IDs: GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 (revision 4, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.0) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend 0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend: affected < 0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe; fixed in 0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 (OSV record GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend >=0 <0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe (fixed)) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GO-2026-6117 (OSV record GO-2026-6117 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend >=0 <0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend >=0 <0.0.0-20260419162744-978ac87deffe) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…