Skip to content

← Actionable
Unrated

Incorrect validation of parties IDs leaks secret keys in Secret-sharing scheme

GHSA-gp6j-vx54-5pmf

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/keep-network/keep-ecdsa 1.8.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
not scored
EPSS
No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Summary In the threshold signature scheme, participants start by dividing secrets into shares using a secret sharing scheme. The Verifiable Secret Sharing scheme generates shares from the user’s IDs but does not properly validate them. Using a malicious ID will make other users reveal their secrets during the secret-sharing procedure. In addition, a second issue resulting from lack of validation could cause nodes to crash when sent maliciously formed user IDs. Details The creation of Parties IDs does not properly validate for maliciously chosen IDs. Parties generate the secret shares in binance-chain/tss-lib codebase that keep-network/keep-ecdsa uses by evaluating the polynomial with the other parties’ IDs. It is critical that these party ids are non-zero because evaluating the polynomial at point 0 reveals the secret. There is a check that these ids are not zero, but this is insufficient since it is not performed modulo the curve order. Therefore, one can set their ID equal to the…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-gp6j-vx54-5pmf

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-gp6j-vx54-5pmf

Advisory: Incorrect validation of parties IDs leaks secret keys in Secret-sharing scheme
IDs: GHSA-gp6j-vx54-5pmf
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-gp6j-vx54-5pmf (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:54 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Unrated
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/keep-network/keep-ecdsa 1.8.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Go github.com/keep-network/keep-ecdsa: affected < 1.8.1; fixed in 1.8.1

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Go github.com/keep-network/keep-ecdsa: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on github.com/keep-network/keep-ecdsa.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gp6j-vx54-5pmf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-gp6j-vx54-5pmf lists affected ranges: Go github.com/keep-network/keep-ecdsa >=0 <1.8.1)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…