Scapy Session Loading Vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via Untrusted Pickle Deserialization
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI scapy
- Affected
- <= 2.6.1
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 lists affected ranges: PyPI scapy >=0 <=2.6.1
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 lists affected ranges: PyPI scapy >=0 <=2.6.1
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 5.4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary An unsafe deserialization vulnerability in Scapy <v2.7.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code when a malicious session file is locally loaded via the -s option. This requires convincing a user to manually load a malicious session file. --- Details Scapy’s interactive shell supports session loading using gzip-compressed pickle files: Internally, this triggers: Since no validation or restriction is performed on the deserialized object, any code embedded via reduce() will be executed immediately. This makes it trivial for an attacker to drop a malicious .pkl.gz in a shared folder and have it executed by unsuspecting users. The vulnerability exists in the loadsession function, which deserializes data using pickle.load() on .pkl.gz files provided via the -s CLI flag or programmatically through conf.session. Affected lines in source code: https://github.com/secdev/scapy/blob/master/scapy/main.py#L569-L572 Impact This is a classic deserialization vulnerability which leads to…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 Advisory: Scapy Session Loading Vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via Untrusted Pickle Deserialization IDs: GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI scapy: affected <= 2.6.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show scapy`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on scapy. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 (OSV record GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 lists affected ranges: PyPI scapy >=0 <=2.6.1) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-cq46-m9x9-j8w2 lists affected ranges: PyPI scapy >=0 <=2.6.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…