Skip to content

← Actionable
Unrated

Network policy may be bypassed by some ICMP Echo Requests

GHSA-c66w-hq56-4q97

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/cilium/cilium 1.9.5, 1.8.8, 1.7.15), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
not scored
EPSS
No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Impact Under certain conditions, ICMP Echo Request sent to a Cilium endpoint from an actor may bypass a network policy which disallows access from the actor to the endpoint, but allows from the endpoint to the actor. This does NOT apply to UDP and TCP traffic. The actor is either a pod or a cluster host or a remote host. The following conditions must be met: 1. Network policies have been created which: a) do not allow access from the actor to the endpoint; b) allow access from the endpoint to the actor and does not specify neither protocol nor port. 2. The endpoint has sent ICMP Echo Request to the actor with the ICMP identifier X. 3. The actor sends ICMP Echo Request to the endpoint with the same ICMP identifier X. 4. The request from the actor (3.) is sent before the Cilium's conntrack GC has removed the previously created conntrack entry (2.). Detailed description See https://github.com/cilium/cilium/commit/dfb008a9099c4da1e0fd964c899c43ee13280b0e (v1.9.x),…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-c66w-hq56-4q97

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-c66w-hq56-4q97

Advisory: Network policy may be bypassed by some ICMP Echo Requests
IDs: GHSA-c66w-hq56-4q97
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-c66w-hq56-4q97 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:54 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Unrated
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/cilium/cilium 1.9.5, 1.8.8, 1.7.15. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Go github.com/cilium/cilium: affected >= 1.7.8, <= 1.7.14; >= 1.8.3, <= 1.8.7; >= 1.9.0, <= 1.9.4; fixed in 1.7.15, 1.8.8, 1.9.5

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Go github.com/cilium/cilium: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on github.com/cilium/cilium.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c66w-hq56-4q97 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-c66w-hq56-4q97 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/cilium/cilium >=1.7.8 =1.8.3 =1.9.0 <=1.9.4)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…