propel/propel1 SQL injection possible with limit() on MySQL
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (propel/propel1 1.7.2), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist propel/propel1
- Affected
- >= 1, <= 1.7.1
- Fixed in
- 1.7.2
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p lists affected ranges: Packagist propel/propel1 >=1 <=1.7.1
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
The limit() query method is susceptible to catastrophic SQL injection with MySQL. For example, given a model User for a table users: This will drop the users table! The cause appears to be a lack of integer casting of the limit input in either Criteria::setLimit() or in DBMySQL::applyLimit(). The code comments there seem to imply that casting was avoided due to overflow issues with 32-bit integers. This is surprising behavior since one of the primary purposes of an ORM is to prevent basic SQL injection. This affects all versions of Propel: 1.x, 2.x, and 3.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p Advisory: propel/propel1 SQL injection possible with limit() on MySQL IDs: GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-7g7c-qhf3-x59p (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: propel/propel1 1.7.2. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist propel/propel1: affected >= 1, <= 1.7.1; fixed in 1.7.2 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist propel/propel1: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on propel/propel1. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-7g7c-qhf3-x59p lists affected ranges: Packagist propel/propel1 >=1 <=1.7.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…