trust-dns vulnerable to Remote Attackers causing Denial-of-Service (packet loops) with crafted DNS packets
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (trust-dns-server 0.23.0-alpha.3, 0.22.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
crates.io trust-dns-server
- Affected
- < 0.22.1>= 0.23.0-alpha.2, < 0.23.0-alpha.3
- Fixed in
- 0.22.1, 0.23.0-alpha.3
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj lists affected ranges: crates.io trust-dns-server >=0 =0.23.0-alpha.2 <0.23.0-alpha.3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
trust-dns and trust-dns-server are vulnerable to remotely triggered denial-of-service attacks, consuming both network and CPU resources. DNS messages with the QR=1 bit set are responded to with a FormErr response. This allows creating a traffic loop, in which these FormErr responses are sent nonstop between vulnerable servers. There are two scenarios how this can be exploited: 1) Create a loop between two instances of trust-dns, consuming network resources, or 2) consuming the CPU of a single instance. With two instances A and B an attacker sends a DNS query with a spoofed source IP address to A. A replies with a FormErr to B. Now both servers with ping-pong the message back and forth until by chance the packet is dropped in the network. Multiple spoofed packets can be sent by the attacker, increasing resource consumption. A single server can get locked up replying to itself. Same setup as above, but now A sends the reply to itself. The packet is sent out as fast as the CPU and…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj Advisory: trust-dns vulnerable to Remote Attackers causing Denial-of-Service (packet loops) with crafted DNS packets IDs: GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-5fm9-h728-fwpj (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:33 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: trust-dns-server 0.23.0-alpha.3, 0.22.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - crates.io trust-dns-server: affected < 0.22.1; >= 0.23.0-alpha.2, < 0.23.0-alpha.3; fixed in 0.22.1, 0.23.0-alpha.3 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - crates.io trust-dns-server: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on trust-dns-server. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj lists affected ranges: crates.io trust-dns-server >=0 =0.23.0-alpha.2 <0.23.0-alpha.3) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…