eth-abi is vulnerable to recursive DoS
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (eth-abi 5.0.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI eth-abi
- Affected
- <= 5.0.0
- Fixed in
- 5.0.1
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 lists affected ranges: PyPI eth-abi >=0 <5.0.1 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 lists affected ranges: PyPI eth-abi >=0 <=5.0.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- not scored
- EPSS
- No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
This is related to recent ZST stuff (https://github.com/ethereum/eth-abi/security/advisories/GHSA-rqr8-pxh7-cq3g), but it's a different one. Basically a recursive pointer issue
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 Advisory: eth-abi is vulnerable to recursive DoS IDs: GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/ghsa-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:51 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Unrated Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: eth-abi 5.0.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI eth-abi: affected <= 5.0.0; fixed in 5.0.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show eth-abi`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on eth-abi. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 (OSV record GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 lists affected ranges: PyPI eth-abi >=0 <5.0.1 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-3qwc-47jf-5rf7 lists affected ranges: PyPI eth-abi >=0 <=5.0.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…