Skip to content

← Actionable
Unrated

Unexpected code execution via escaped quotes in //go:cgo_ldflag in cmd/go and cmd/compile

CVE-2026-97043

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (toolchain 1.27.4, 1.26.11), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • Go toolchain

    Affected
    < 1.26.11>= 1.27.0-0, < 1.27.4
    Fixed in
    1.26.11, 1.27.4

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
not scored
EPSS
No dated EPSS signal available.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Building a malicious package that uses cgo could bypass "#cgo LDFLAGS" validation and cause unexpected code execution at build time, or cause the go command to panic, via crafted quoting in "//go:cgo_ldflag" directives. When "cmd/cgo" generates "_cgo_gotypes.go", it quotes each "#cgo LDFLAGS" argument with strconv.Quote in a "//go:cgo_ldflag" directive, but "cmd/compile" and "cmd/go" parsed those directives by splitting on raw quote characters without handling backslash escapes or unquoting the string. This mismatch allowed disallowed linker flags or unvalidated linker search paths to be smuggled past the go command's flag checks and passed to the external linker. In addition, deduplicating LDFLAGS in the go command could panic with an out-of-bounds slice index when a prefix of the flag list matched near the end of the slice. "cmd/compile" and "cmd/go" now properly handle backslash-escaped quotes and unquote "//go:cgo_*" pragma strings with strconv.Unquote, and the slice bounds check…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GO-2026-6848

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-97043

Advisory: Unexpected code execution via escaped quotes in //go:cgo_ldflag in cmd/go and cmd/compile
IDs: CVE-2026-97043
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-97043 (revision 1, source checked 11 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Unrated
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: toolchain 1.27.4, 1.26.11. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Go toolchain: affected < 1.26.11; >= 1.27.0-0, < 1.27.4; fixed in 1.26.11, 1.27.4

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Go toolchain: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on toolchain.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GO-2026-6848 (OSV record GO-2026-6848 lists affected ranges: Go toolchain >=0 =1.27.0-0 <1.27.4 (fixed))

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…