Concrete CMS is vulnerable to IDOR in AddMessage/UpdateMessage
CVE-2026-7886GHSA-p8p9-5953-h9jw
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (concrete5/concrete5 9.5.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist concrete5/concrete5
- Affected
- < 9.5.1
- Fixed in
- 9.5.1
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-p8p9-5953-h9jw lists affected ranges: Packagist concrete5/concrete5 >=0 <9.5.1
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-7886: 0.29% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 21.41 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to IDOR in AddMessage/UpdateMessage via attachments[] parameter which can lead to file permission bypass. The AddMessage and UpdateMessage conversation controllers accept user-supplied file attachment IDs and load files directly via $em-find(File::class, $attachmentID) without checking per-file permissions (canViewFile()). A user who can post in any conversation can reference any file in the CMS file manager by its sequential ID, effectively bypassing the file permission system. If a site truly has private files, the owner should set up a private storage location https://documentation.concretecms.org/user-guide/editors-reference/dashboard/system-and-maintenance/files/file-storage-locations outside of the webroot so that permissions can be checked on view as well. That way, even if an authorized user attaches a file, or otherwise links to it, unauthorized users won't be able to view the file.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-p8p9-5953-h9jw
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-7886 Advisory: Concrete CMS is vulnerable to IDOR in AddMessage/UpdateMessage IDs: CVE-2026-7886, GHSA-p8p9-5953-h9jw Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-7886 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:49 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Low (CVSS 2.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: concrete5/concrete5 9.5.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist concrete5/concrete5: affected < 9.5.1; fixed in 9.5.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist concrete5/concrete5: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on concrete5/concrete5. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p8p9-5953-h9jw (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-p8p9-5953-h9jw lists affected ranges: Packagist concrete5/concrete5 >=0 <9.5.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…