Skip to content

← Actionable
High, CVSS 8.1amended

SeaweedFS: Filer JWT allowed_prefixes literal prefix match allows cross-tenant access to sibling paths

CVE-2026-72921GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
8.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-72921: 0.43% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 36.95 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Impact When a filer JWT restricts a token to a set of path prefixes via allowedprefixes, the authorization check used a literal byte-prefix match (strings.HasPrefix). A token scoped to /tenant1 therefore also authorized requests to sibling paths such as /tenant1234, /tenant1-old, and /tenant1backup. In a multi-tenant deployment this lets the holder of one tenant's token access another tenant's data. Because allowedprefixes gates both read and write tokens, the impact covers cross-tenant reads and writes. A valid scoped token is required, so this is an authorization bypass rather than a fully unauthenticated flaw. Affected component - weed/server/filerserverhandlers.go (JWT allowedprefixes authorization check) Patches Fixed in 4.24. The check now matches on /-separated path components after path.Clean normalisation, so /tenant1 authorizes only /tenant1 and its descendants — not /tenant1234 or other sibling paths. Workarounds Where feasible, choose prefix names that are not…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 3 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq

  2. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from osv record GO-2026-6361

  3. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-72921

Advisory: SeaweedFS: Filer JWT allowed_prefixes literal prefix match allows cross-tenant access to sibling paths
IDs: CVE-2026-72921, GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-72921 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:28 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: High (CVSS 8.1)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Go github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs: affected < 0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2; fixed in 0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Go github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq (OSV record GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq lists affected ranges: Go github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs >=0 <0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2 (fixed))
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GO-2026-6361 (OSV record GO-2026-6361 lists affected ranges: Go github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs >=0 <0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2 (fixed))
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq lists affected ranges: Go github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs >=0 <0.0.0-20260512171048-05ed5c9ae8a2)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…