Better Auth: Account takeover via pre-account hijacking on magic-link and email-OTP sign-in
CVE-2026-67327GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (better-auth 1.7.0-beta.10, 1.6.22), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
npm better-auth
- Affected
- >= 1.1.3, < 1.6.22>= 1.7.0-beta.0, < 1.7.0-beta.10
- Fixed in
- 1.7.0-beta.10, 1.6.22
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 lists affected ranges: npm better-auth >=1.1.3 =1.7.0-beta.0 <1.7.0-beta.10 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 lists affected ranges: npm better-auth >=1.1.3 =1.7.0-beta.0 <1.7.0-beta.10
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-67327: 0.43% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 37.15 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Am I affected You are affected if all of the following hold: - You run a better-auth version below 1.6.22, or a 1.7.0-beta below 1.7.0-beta.10. - You enable the magic-link plugin or the email-OTP plugin. - You also enable email and password sign-up with open registration. - An account can exist at an address before its owner first signs in with the passwordless flow. Summary An attacker can keep password access to a victim's account after the victim starts using it. The attack runs in three steps. First, with open registration, the attacker signs up using the victim's email and a password the attacker picks. The account stays unverified, so the attacker cannot use it yet. Later the real owner signs in with a magic link or an email OTP. That step marks the account verified, and the attacker's password now works on it. Details When an account already exists for an address, magic-link verification and email-OTP sign-in both sign in to that account. They mark it verified and issue a…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-67327 Advisory: Better Auth: Account takeover via pre-account hijacking on magic-link and email-OTP sign-in IDs: CVE-2026-67327, GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-67327 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:58 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: better-auth 1.7.0-beta.10, 1.6.22. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm better-auth: affected >= 1.1.3, < 1.6.22; >= 1.7.0-beta.0, < 1.7.0-beta.10; fixed in 1.7.0-beta.10, 1.6.22 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls better-auth --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on better-auth. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 (OSV record GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 lists affected ranges: npm better-auth >=1.1.3 =1.7.0-beta.0 <1.7.0-beta.10 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 lists affected ranges: npm better-auth >=1.1.3 =1.7.0-beta.0 <1.7.0-beta.10) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…