Dompdf: Uncontrolled resource consumption based on declared BMP dimensions
CVE-2026-59941GHSA-8hg6-c449-896m
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (dompdf/dompdf 3.1.6), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist dompdf/dompdf
- Affected
- < 3.1.6
- Fixed in
- 3.1.6
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8hg6-c449-896m lists affected ranges: Packagist dompdf/dompdf >=0 <3.1.6
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 6.3 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-59941: 0.64% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 50.92 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary dompdf accepts a BMP image and generates a PDF-compatible PNG based only on its declared header dimensions and never bounds width × height before the image is converted through GD. A 58-byte BMP whose header declares e.g. 6000×6000 is accepted and later drives imagecreatetruecolor($width, $height) (and PHP's native BMP decoder) to allocate the full pixel canvas. A payload can fit in a single HTTP request: the BMP can be inlined as a data:image/bmp;base64,… URI inside attacker-controlled HTML, so no upload, no remote fetch, and no chroot-reachable file is required. It was demonstrated that a 169-byte request drove dompdf to render to ~412 MB peak RSS and ~4.8 s of CPU/wall time, versus ~34 MB for an identically-sized benign request — roughly a 12× memory amplification per request, repeatable and unauthenticated. Details Root cause The image is processed based on declared dimensions and type alone — no pixel budget: For BMPs that getimagesize() does not fully parse, dompdf…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-8hg6-c449-896m
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-59941 Advisory: Dompdf: Uncontrolled resource consumption based on declared BMP dimensions IDs: CVE-2026-59941, GHSA-8hg6-c449-896m Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-59941 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: dompdf/dompdf 3.1.6. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist dompdf/dompdf: affected < 3.1.6; fixed in 3.1.6 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist dompdf/dompdf: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on dompdf/dompdf. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8hg6-c449-896m (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8hg6-c449-896m lists affected ranges: Packagist dompdf/dompdf >=0 <3.1.6) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…