Phalcon: Non-constant-time HMAC verification in Encryption\Crypt::decrypt (timing side-channel)
CVE-2026-54736GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (phalcon/cphalcon 5.14.1), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist phalcon/cphalcon
- Affected
- <= 5.14.0
- Fixed in
- 5.14.1
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj lists affected ranges: Packagist phalcon/cphalcon >=0 <5.14.1 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj lists affected ranges: Packagist phalcon/cphalcon >=0 <=5.14.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 8.2 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-54736: 0.18% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 7.66 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Phalcon\Encryption\Crypt provides authenticated encryption: when useSigning is enabled (the default), encrypt() appends an HMAC tag and decrypt() verifies it before returning the plaintext. The verification compares the attacker-supplied tag against the freshly computed HMAC using PHP/Zephir identity comparison (!==), which the Zephir compiler lowers to !ZEPHIRISIDENTICAL(...) — a byte-wise memcmp that returns early on the first differing byte. The comparison time therefore depends on how many leading bytes of the supplied tag are correct, a classic MAC-verification timing side-channel. Every other secret/MAC comparison in the framework uses the constant-time hashequals() (zephirhashequals) — the CSRF token check (Security::checkToken) and the JWT signature check (Signer\Hmac::verify); Crypt::decrypt is the lone deviation. Details Vulnerable code phalcon/Encryption/Crypt.zep:246 (Zephir source): Generated C -- ext/phalcon/encryption/crypt.zep.c:364-367: ZEPHIRISIDENTICAL --…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-54736 Advisory: Phalcon: Non-constant-time HMAC verification in `Encryption\Crypt::decrypt` (timing side-channel) IDs: CVE-2026-54736, GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-54736 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.2) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: phalcon/cphalcon 5.14.1. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist phalcon/cphalcon: affected <= 5.14.0; fixed in 5.14.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist phalcon/cphalcon: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on phalcon/cphalcon. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj (OSV record GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj lists affected ranges: Packagist phalcon/cphalcon >=0 <5.14.1 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8jqh-95g6-7jpj lists affected ranges: Packagist phalcon/cphalcon >=0 <=5.14.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…