datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema $ref to HTTP URL (silent by default)
CVE-2026-54690GHSA-954p-556p-r752
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (datamodel-code-generator 0.61.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
- Affected
- >= 0.9.1, <= 0.60.2
- Fixed in
- 0.61.0
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-954p-556p-r752 lists affected ranges: PyPI datamodel-code-generator >=0.9.1 <=0.60.2
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.2 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-54690: 0.39% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 32.98 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary JSON-Schema $ref values pointing at HTTP or HTTPS URLs are silently dereferenced by datamodel-code-generator with no IP/host validation, no scheme allow-list, and redirects followed unconditionally. The --allow-remote-refs gate added in 0.56.0 defaults to None, which only emits a deprecation warning and then fetches the URL anyway; only explicit --allow-remote-refs=false blocks the request. The fetched body is parsed as a sub-schema and reflected verbatim into the generated .py source. As a result, any JSON-Schema document the developer feeds to datamodel-codegen — including documents authored by an attacker — can pivot to arbitrary internal addresses and leak the response into the generated code, with no developer cooperation beyond running the tool. Details Sink: src/datamodelcodegenerator/parser/jsonschema.py, getrefbody (lines 4776–4793, at tag 0.60.1 / commit a321547e): - (A) emits a deprecation warning when allowremoterefs is its default (None); execution falls through…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-954p-556p-r752
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-54690 Advisory: datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to SSRF via JSON-Schema `$ref` to HTTP URL (silent by default) IDs: CVE-2026-54690, GHSA-954p-556p-r752 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-54690 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.2) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: datamodel-code-generator 0.61.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI datamodel-code-generator: affected >= 0.9.1, <= 0.60.2; fixed in 0.61.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show datamodel-code-generator`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on datamodel-code-generator. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-954p-556p-r752 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-954p-556p-r752 lists affected ranges: PyPI datamodel-code-generator >=0.9.1 <=0.60.2) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…