Dragonfly scheduler v1 and v2 gRPC unauthenticated SSRF via attacker-controlled PeerHost in DownloadTinyFile
CVE-2026-54637GHSA-chwm-m7g7-685g
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 2.4.4-rc.3), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
- Affected
- <= 2.4.4-rc.2
- Fixed in
- 2.4.4-rc.3
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-chwm-m7g7-685g lists affected ranges: Go d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 >=0 <=2.4.4-rc.2
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 5.5 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-54637: 0.80% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 56.62 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The Dragonfly scheduler's v1 gRPC service contains an unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). When a peer reports a successful download of a TINY task, the scheduler calls Peer.DownloadTinyFile() and issues an HTTP GET to a host and port taken verbatim from the attacker-controlled PeerHost.Ip / PeerHost.DownPort fields of the gRPC request body. The HTTP client uses a bare http.Transport with no address validation, so a remote, unauthenticated client can force the scheduler to connect to arbitrary internal addresses, including 127.0.0.1 (loopback), 169.254.0.0/16 (link-local, e.g. cloud metadata), and RFC1918 ranges. The fetched response is stored in Task.DirectPiece and can subsequently be served to other peers, making this a read-SSRF with a data-exfiltration path. The manager's preheat code path already wraps its HTTP client with nethttp.NewSafeDialer() (which rejects non-global-unicast destinations); the scheduler's DownloadTinyFile path is missing this guard…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-chwm-m7g7-685g
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-54637 Advisory: Dragonfly scheduler v1 and v2 gRPC unauthenticated SSRF via attacker-controlled PeerHost in DownloadTinyFile IDs: CVE-2026-54637, GHSA-chwm-m7g7-685g Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-54637 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:24 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 2.4.4-rc.3. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go d7y.io/dragonfly/v2: affected <= 2.4.4-rc.2; fixed in 2.4.4-rc.3 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go d7y.io/dragonfly/v2: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on d7y.io/dragonfly/v2. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-chwm-m7g7-685g (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-chwm-m7g7-685g lists affected ranges: Go d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 >=0 <=2.4.4-rc.2) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…