django CMS: Plugin move endpoint allows cyclic reparenting (DoS)
CVE-2026-54623GHSA-8jj7-4v57-frf5
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (django-cms 5.0.8), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI django-cms
- Affected
- < 5.0.8
- Fixed in
- 5.0.8
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8jj7-4v57-frf5 lists affected ranges: PyPI django-cms >=0 <5.0.8
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 7.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-54623: 0.49% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 41.99 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The moveplugin admin endpoint does not prevent a plugin from being reparented under itself or one of its own descendants. Doing so creates a cycle in the plugin tree, after which the recursive descendant/ancestor SQL queries loop without terminating, stalling the request worker. Details moveplugin (in cms/admin/placeholderadmin.py) accepts a pluginparent POST parameter and, for an in-placeholder move, sets the plugin's parent to the target without any cycle/ancestor check. If the target parent is a descendant of the moved plugin, the resulting parentid graph contains a cycle. Descendant and ancestor traversal is implemented with WITH RECURSIVE CTEs (getdescendantscte / getancestorscte in cms/models/pluginmodel.py) that have no cycle clause or depth limit. On a cyclic tree these recurse indefinitely (PostgreSQL/SQLite) or error at the recursion limit (MySQL). getdescendants() is invoked while building the move response and on subsequent operations on the affected subtree.…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-8jj7-4v57-frf5
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-54623 Advisory: django CMS: Plugin move endpoint allows cyclic reparenting (DoS) IDs: CVE-2026-54623, GHSA-8jj7-4v57-frf5 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-54623 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.1) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: django-cms 5.0.8. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI django-cms: affected < 5.0.8; fixed in 5.0.8 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show django-cms`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on django-cms. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8jj7-4v57-frf5 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8jj7-4v57-frf5 lists affected ranges: PyPI django-cms >=0 <5.0.8) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…