@budibase/backend-core has potential SSRF DNS rebinding bypass in outbound fetch validation
CVE-2026-54353GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (@budibase/backend-core 3.39.9), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
- Affected
- < 3.39.9
- Fixed in
- 3.39.9
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf lists affected ranges: npm @budibase/backend-core >=0 <3.39.9 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf lists affected ranges: npm @budibase/backend-core >=0 <3.39.9
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 8.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-54353: 0.21% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 11.62 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Authenticated users with automation permissions can bypass Budibase's SSRF blacklist through DNS rebinding. The outbound fetch flow validates a hostname against the blacklist before the request is sent, but the actual socket connection later performs a separate DNS lookup through node-fetch. Since the validated IPs are never pinned to the connection, an attacker-controlled hostname can return a public IP during validation and a private/internal IP during the real connection. This results in a non-blind SSRF primitive against internal services reachable from the Budibase host, including loopback, RFC1918 ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints. Details The issue comes from the outbound fetch validation flow resolving DNS twice: During blacklist validation Again during the real socket connection The first lookup result is discarded after validation, so the second lookup is free to resolve to a different IP. This creates a classic TOCTOU DNS rebinding issue. Affected flow in:…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-54353 Advisory: @budibase/backend-core has potential SSRF DNS rebinding bypass in outbound fetch validation IDs: CVE-2026-54353, GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-54353 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: @budibase/backend-core 3.39.9. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm @budibase/backend-core: affected < 3.39.9; fixed in 3.39.9 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls @budibase/backend-core --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on @budibase/backend-core. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf (OSV record GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf lists affected ranges: npm @budibase/backend-core >=0 <3.39.9 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-gfq7-5x4g-3xhf lists affected ranges: npm @budibase/backend-core >=0 <3.39.9) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…