NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL
CVE-2026-53930GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
npm nocodb
- Affected
- <= 0.301.3
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 lists affected ranges: npm nocodb >=0 <=0.301.3
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 lists affected ranges: npm nocodb >=0 <=0.301.3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 5.1 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-53930: 0.39% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 32.96 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The base-migration endpoint accepted a caller-supplied URL that the migration worker dereferenced without enforcing protocol or destination, allowing scheme abuse (file:, ftp:, etc.) and probing of internal HTTP destinations. Details The migrate endpoint is restricted to the workspace owner role by ACL. The remaining gaps were (a) protocol validation — the controller now parses body.migrationUrl as a URL and rejects anything whose protocol is not http: or https: — and (b) private destination filtering — the worker already runs through useAgent(targetUrl) from request-filtering-agent, which blocks RFC 1918, loopback, and link-local at the socket layer. Impact With the workspace owner role, a malformed URL could be used to coerce the migration worker into reading local files or talking to non-HTTP services; combined with the HTTP-only filter, owner-supplied targets could not reach private ranges. Credit This issue was reported by Devel Group Security Research Team through…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-53930 Advisory: NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL IDs: CVE-2026-53930, GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-53930 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.1) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm nocodb: affected <= 0.301.3 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls nocodb --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on nocodb. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 (OSV record GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 lists affected ranges: npm nocodb >=0 <=0.301.3) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 lists affected ranges: npm nocodb >=0 <=0.301.3) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…