Improper Authorization in Kimai Timesheet Restart and Duplicate Allows New Timesheets After Project Access Revocation
CVE-2026-52822GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (kimai/kimai 2.58.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist kimai/kimai
- Affected
- <= 2.57.0
- Fixed in
- 2.58.0
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh lists affected ranges: Packagist kimai/kimai >=0 <=2.57.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 5.3 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-52822: 0.46% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 40.31 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains an authenticated authorization bypass in the timesheet restart and duplicate workflows. After a user loses access to a project, the user can still derive a new timesheet from one of their historical entries and create a new record under that now-unauthorized project and activity combination. This is a permission revocation bypass with persistent write impact. The issue affects both restart and duplicate, which trust ownership of an old timesheet more than the user's current access to the underlying project, activity, and customer. Details The issue affects the following operations: - PATCH /api/timesheets/{id}/restart - PATCH /api/timesheets/{id}/duplicate The root cause is that authorization gives too much weight to the fact that the original timesheet belongs to the current user. In src/Voter/TimesheetVoter.php, the owntimesheet branch is evaluated before team-based access checks. The restart/duplicate capability check also verifies only object…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-52822 Advisory: Improper Authorization in Kimai Timesheet Restart and Duplicate Allows New Timesheets After Project Access Revocation IDs: CVE-2026-52822, GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-52822 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: kimai/kimai 2.58.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist kimai/kimai: affected <= 2.57.0; fixed in 2.58.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist kimai/kimai: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on kimai/kimai. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-c6w6-57jj-62vh lists affected ranges: Packagist kimai/kimai >=0 <=2.57.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…