Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins: Sudoers may be able to obtain privilege escalation via /usr/bin/apt-get arguments
CVE-2026-52817GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (linuxfabrik-lib 5.1.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI linuxfabrik-lib
- Affected
- <= 5.0.0
- Fixed in
- 5.1.0
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg lists affected ranges: PyPI linuxfabrik-lib >=0 <5.1.0 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg lists affected ranges: PyPI linuxfabrik-lib >=0 <=5.0.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 7.0 · CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-52817: 0.18% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 7.59 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary In the Debian.sudoers file, apt-get is allowed for the nagios user. The full command including the arguments are not enforced and can therefore be choosen arbitrarily. This allows to easily get a root shell as the nagios user: PoC By choosing a particular argument, you can get (as a nagios user) a root shell: Since the nagious user can use sudo to run apt-get as root, the resulting shell is also running as root. Impact The vulnerability is a local privilege escalation, impacting users who use the provided sudoers file. It requires that an attacker already compromised the nagios account (which is quite a high barrier to be honest). Fix Since only one place where apt-get is currently used (in deb-updates) was found, it should be enough to allow only the specific arguments used there. Here an example how the line in the sudoers file could look like:
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-52817 Advisory: Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins: Sudoers may be able to obtain privilege escalation via /usr/bin/apt-get arguments IDs: CVE-2026-52817, GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-52817 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.0) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: linuxfabrik-lib 5.1.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI linuxfabrik-lib: affected <= 5.0.0; fixed in 5.1.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show linuxfabrik-lib`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on linuxfabrik-lib. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg (OSV record GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg lists affected ranges: PyPI linuxfabrik-lib >=0 <5.1.0 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-8w6w-23mq-h8rg lists affected ranges: PyPI linuxfabrik-lib >=0 <=5.0.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…