YesWiki has Unsafe eval() in its Formula Calculato, Leading to Remote Code Execution & Denial of Service
CVE-2026-52778GHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (yeswiki/yeswiki 4.6.6), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist yeswiki/yeswiki
- Affected
- < 4.6.6
- Fixed in
- 4.6.6
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8 lists affected ranges: Packagist yeswiki/yeswiki >=0 <4.6.6
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-52778: 0.80% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 56.57 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary An unsafe execution vulnerability exists in the Bazar form field calculator (CalcField.php) of YesWiki. The application attempts to sanitize user-defined mathematical formulas using a complex recursive regular expression before passing them to the PHP eval() function. This implementation is inherently flawed: it is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS / Stack Overflow) which can crash the server, and it creates a high-risk architecture where any logic bypass directly results in arbitrary PHP code execution. Details Affected Component - File: tools/bazar/fields/CalcField.php - Method: formatValuesBeforeSave($entry) - Vulnerable Mechanism: Combination of a complex recursive regex validation followed by eval(). The code attempts to implement a sandbox for mathematical operations by verifying the formula structure before executing it: Architectural Flaws PCRE Stack Overflow & ReDoS (The Immediate Exploit): The regex definition heavily relies on a recursive…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-52778 Advisory: YesWiki has Unsafe eval() in its Formula Calculato, Leading to Remote Code Execution & Denial of Service IDs: CVE-2026-52778, GHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-52778 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: yeswiki/yeswiki 4.6.6. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist yeswiki/yeswiki: affected < 4.6.6; fixed in 4.6.6 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist yeswiki/yeswiki: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on yeswiki/yeswiki. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8 lists affected ranges: Packagist yeswiki/yeswiki >=0 <4.6.6) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…