YouTransfer has an issue in the sendmail transport integration that allows arbitrary code execution
CVE-2026-50880GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
npm youtransfer
- Affected
- <= 1.0.6
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj lists affected ranges: npm youtransfer >=0 <=1.0.6
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj lists affected ranges: npm youtransfer >=0 <=1.0.6
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-50880: 0.48% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 41.21 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
An issue in the sendmail transport integration component of YouTransfer v1.0.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via supplying a crafted request.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-50880 Advisory: YouTransfer has an issue in the sendmail transport integration that allows arbitrary code execution IDs: CVE-2026-50880, GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-50880 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm youtransfer: affected <= 1.0.6 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls youtransfer --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on youtransfer. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj lists affected ranges: npm youtransfer >=0 <=1.0.6) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj (OSV record GHSA-68mc-h6h8-79wj lists affected ranges: npm youtransfer >=0 <=1.0.6) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…