9router has an Incomplete Fix: Local-Only Access Gate Bypass in 9router via Host Header SpoofING
CVE-2026-49353GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
npm 9router
- Affected
- <= 0.4.55
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf lists affected ranges: npm 9router >=0 <=0.4.55
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf lists affected ranges: npm 9router >=0 <=0.4.55
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 7.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-49353: 0.34% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 26.94 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The fix for CVE-2026-46339 (unauthenticated RCE via unprotected MCP plugin routes) introduced a local-only access gate in src/dashboardGuard.js that restricts spawn-capable routes (/api/mcp/, /api/tunnel/, /api/cli-tools/) to loopback requests. The gate determines "local" by inspecting the Host and Origin HTTP headers rather than the TCP source address. When 9router is deployed behind a reverse proxy, tunnel (Cloudflare Tunnel, Tailscale — both natively supported), or is subject to DNS rebinding, these headers are attacker-controlled, allowing the local-only gate to be bypassed. A second factor (CLI token or JWT cookie) is required by canAccessLocalOnlyRoute(), but the CLI token is a deterministic HMAC of the machine ID (getConsistentMachineId), which is stable and predictable on cloud VMs. If the attacker can obtain or guess the machine ID (e.g., via another information disclosure, or on shared-tenant infrastructure), the full chain to MCP child process stdin injection is…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-49353 Advisory: 9router has an Incomplete Fix: Local-Only Access Gate Bypass in 9router via Host Header SpoofING IDs: CVE-2026-49353, GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-49353 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.5) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm 9router: affected <= 0.4.55 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls 9router --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on 9router. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf (OSV record GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf lists affected ranges: npm 9router >=0 <=0.4.55) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-6g2f-w7g3-77vf lists affected ranges: npm 9router >=0 <=0.4.55) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…