PyJWT: Algorithm allow-list bypass when decoding with PyJWK / PyJWKClient keys
CVE-2026-48523GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (pyjwt 2.13.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI pyjwt
- Affected
- >= 2.9.0, < 2.13.0
- Fixed in
- 2.13.0
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f lists affected ranges: PyPI pyjwt >=2.9.0 <2.13.0 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f lists affected ranges: PyPI pyjwt >=2.9.0 <2.13.0
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.4 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-48523: 0.13% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 2.36 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
[!NOTE] Scored assuming a deployment where algorithm policy functions as an authentication/authorization boundary. In deployments where the algorithm policy enforces crypto agility only, the practical confidentiality impact is lower and the issue is closer to an integrity-of-policy-enforcement bug. PyJWT 2.9.0 through 2.12.1 allows a verifier-side algorithm allow-list bypass when jwt.decode() or jwt.decodecomplete() are called with a PyJWK key. The token header alg is checked against the caller-supplied algorithms allow-list, but signature verification is performed with the algorithm bound to the PyJWK object instead of the header algorithm. An attacker who controls a registered JWK/JWKS private key can sign with a disallowed algorithm, advertise an allowed algorithm in the JWT header, and still be accepted. The issue affects the documented PyJWKClient.getsigningkeyfromjwt(...) flow. Summary PyJWT's PyJWK verification path allows a verifier-side algorithm allow-list bypass. In…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-48523 Advisory: PyJWT: Algorithm allow-list bypass when decoding with `PyJWK` / `PyJWKClient` keys IDs: CVE-2026-48523, GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-48523 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:45 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: pyjwt 2.13.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI pyjwt: affected >= 2.9.0, < 2.13.0; fixed in 2.13.0 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show pyjwt`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on pyjwt. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f (OSV record GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f lists affected ranges: PyPI pyjwt >=2.9.0 <2.13.0 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f lists affected ranges: PyPI pyjwt >=2.9.0 <2.13.0) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…