Open WebUI: Mass Assignment via FeedbackForm extra=allow Allows Feedback User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulation
CVE-2026-45396GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (open-webui 0.9.5), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI open-webui
- Affected
- < 0.9.5
- Fixed in
- 0.9.5
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g lists affected ranges: PyPI open-webui >=0 <0.9.5 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g lists affected ranges: PyPI open-webui >=0 <0.9.5
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.4 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-45396: 0.31% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 23.56 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Mass Assignment in Feedback Creation Allows User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulation Summary The POST /api/v1/evaluations/feedback endpoint in Open WebUI v0.9.2 is vulnerable to mass assignment via FeedbackForm, which uses modelconfig = ConfigDict(extra='allow'). Due to an insecure dictionary merge order in insertnewfeedback(), an authenticated attacker can inject a userid field in the request body that overwrites the server-derived value, creating feedback records attributed to any arbitrary user. This corrupts the model evaluation leaderboard (Elo ratings) and enables identity spoofing. Details The vulnerability exists in two layers: 1. Model Layer — Insecure Dict Merge Order File: backend/openwebui/models/feedbacks.py, lines 148–160 In Python, when a dictionary literal contains duplicate keys, the last value wins. Since formdata.modeldump() appears after 'userid': userid, any userid field in the form data overwrites the authenticated user's ID. 2. Schema Layer —…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-45396 Advisory: Open WebUI: Mass Assignment via FeedbackForm extra=allow Allows Feedback User ID Spoofing and Evaluation Data Manipulation IDs: CVE-2026-45396, GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-45396 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:41 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: open-webui 0.9.5. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI open-webui: affected < 0.9.5; fixed in 0.9.5 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show open-webui`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on open-webui. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g (OSV record GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g lists affected ranges: PyPI open-webui >=0 <0.9.5 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-rjmp-vjf2-qf4g lists affected ranges: PyPI open-webui >=0 <0.9.5) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…