wger: trainer_login accepts GET - CSRF bypass enables forced session rebinding
CVE-2026-45161GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI wger
- Affected
- <= 2.1
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.4 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-45161: 0.09% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 0.35 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The trainerlogin view in wger accepts GET requests and executes djangologin() without any CSRF protection, because Django's CsrfViewMiddleware only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single <img tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer's session to an arbitrary user account. Details File: wger/core/views/user.py, approximately lines 161-210 Because the view handles GET, Django's CSRF middleware does not validate any token. An attacker can place <img src="https://wger.target/en/user/2/trainer-login" on any web page. When an authenticated trainer's browser loads that page, it issues the GET request with the session cookie attached (SameSite=Lax does not block same-site top-level navigation and subresource hops triggered by same-origin redirects). The server executes djangologin() and issues a new session cookie…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-45161 Advisory: wger: trainer_login accepts GET - CSRF bypass enables forced session rebinding IDs: CVE-2026-45161, GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-45161 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI wger: affected <= 2.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show wger`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on wger. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf (OSV record GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…