Nitro has a proxy scope bypass via percent-encoded path traversal in routeRules
CVE-2026-44373GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (nitro 3.0.260429-beta; nitropack 2.13.4), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q lists affected ranges: npm nitro >=0 =0 <2.13.4 (fixed)
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q lists affected ranges: npm nitro >=0 =0 <2.13.4
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-44373: 0.45% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 39.37 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
A proxy route rule like: is intended to limit the proxy to URLs under /api/orders/. Before the patch, an attacker could bypass that scope by sending percent-encoded path traversal (..%2f) in the URL, causing Nitro to forward a request that the upstream resolved outside the configured scope. Example exploit: Nitro sees ..%2f as opaque characters at match time, the /api/orders/ rule matched, and the raw path was forwarded to the upstream as /orders/..%2fadmin/config.json. An upstream that decodes %2F to / then resolved .. and can serve /admin/config.json outside the intended scope. Are you affected? Users may be affected if ALL of the following are true: 1. Their project uses Nitro's routeRules with a proxy entry ({ proxy: { to: "..." } }). 2. The proxy to value uses a / wildcard suffix to forward sub-paths. 3. The upstream behind the proxy decodes %2F as / before routing or filesystem lookup. 4. Proxy route rules are not handled natively at CDN (nitro v3 and vercel) Whether the bypass…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-44373 Advisory: Nitro has a proxy scope bypass via percent-encoded path traversal in `routeRules` IDs: CVE-2026-44373, GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-44373 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:52 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: nitro 3.0.260429-beta; nitropack 2.13.4. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm nitro: affected < 3.0.260429-beta; fixed in 3.0.260429-beta - npm nitropack: affected < 2.13.4; fixed in 2.13.4 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls nitro --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. - `npm ls nitropack --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on nitro, nitropack. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q (OSV record GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q lists affected ranges: npm nitro >=0 =0 <2.13.4 (fixed)) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-5w89-w975-hf9q lists affected ranges: npm nitro >=0 =0 <2.13.4) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…