misp-modules has nsafe remote resource fetching in expansion
CVE-2026-44363GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI misp-modules
- Affected
- <= 3.0.7
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j lists affected ranges: PyPI misp-modules >=0 <=3.0.7
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j lists affected ranges: PyPI misp-modules >=0 <=3.0.7
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 5.8 · CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-44363: 0.10% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 0.92 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
An unsafe remote resource fetching vulnerability existed in MISP Modules expansion modules. The htmltomarkdown module accepted arbitrary HTTP(S) URLs without sufficient validation, which could allow Server-Side Request Forgery against loopback, private, or link-local network resources. Additionally, the qrcode module disabled TLS certificate verification when retrieving remote images, exposing requests to potential man-in-the-middle interception or response tampering. The issue was fixed by validating URL schemes, blocking local and private address ranges, resolving hostnames before fetching, enforcing request timeouts, and re-enabling TLS certificate verification. As reported by Bilal Teke.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-44363 Advisory: misp-modules has nsafe remote resource fetching in expansion IDs: CVE-2026-44363, GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-44363 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:41 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI misp-modules: affected <= 3.0.7 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show misp-modules`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on misp-modules. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j (OSV record GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j lists affected ranges: PyPI misp-modules >=0 <=3.0.7) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-fhq3-2gf3-8f3j lists affected ranges: PyPI misp-modules >=0 <=3.0.7) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…