Froxlor has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-30932
CVE-2026-41237GHSA-j6fm-9rfm-j5hx
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (froxlor/froxlor 2.3.7), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist froxlor/froxlor
- Affected
- <= 2.3.6
- Fixed in
- 2.3.7
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-j6fm-9rfm-j5hx lists affected ranges: Packagist froxlor/froxlor >=0 <=2.3.6
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 8.6 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-41237: 0.27% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 19.16 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary The LOC record regex uses \s+ which matches newlines (allowing embedded newlines to pass), TLSA matchingType=0 has no upper bound on hex data length, and all validators return raw input without zone-file escaping. Affected Package - Ecosystem: Other - Package: froxlor - Affected versions: all versions before fix commit b34829262dc3 - Patched versions: = commit b34829262dc3 Severity Medium -- CVSS CWE CWE-74 -- Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (Injection) Details DNS record content is concatenated directly into bind9 zone files at DnsEntry.php line 83. Before the fix, LOC/RP/SSHFP/TLSA records had no content validation at all, enabling zone file injection via embedded newlines. The fix adds format-specific regexes and field validation but has gaps: the LOC regex's \s+ matches newlines in PHP's PCRE engine, allowing a LOC record with a newline between fields to pass validation but produce multiple lines in the zone file. TLSA…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-j6fm-9rfm-j5hx
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-41237 Advisory: Froxlor has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-30932 IDs: CVE-2026-41237, GHSA-j6fm-9rfm-j5hx Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-41237 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:49 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 8.6) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: froxlor/froxlor 2.3.7. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist froxlor/froxlor: affected <= 2.3.6; fixed in 2.3.7 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist froxlor/froxlor: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on froxlor/froxlor. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j6fm-9rfm-j5hx (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-j6fm-9rfm-j5hx lists affected ranges: Packagist froxlor/froxlor >=0 <=2.3.6) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…