Skip to content
Patch Next
Sign inAdd to your agent

← Actionable
Low, CVSS 3.1

nimiq-transaction: Panic via HistoryTreeProof length mismatch

CVE-2026-34067GHSA-264v-m8fm-76jm

What to do

Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Add to your agent

Affected packages

  • crates.io nimiq-transaction

    Affected
    <= 0.2.0
    Fixed in
    no fixed version recorded

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
3.1 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-34067: 0.32% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 24.84 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Impact HistoryTreeProof::verify panics on a malformed proof where history.len() != positions.len() due to asserteq!(history.len(), positions.len()). The proof object is derived from untrusted p2p responses (ResponseTransactionsProof.proof) and is therefore attacker-controlled at the network boundary until validated. A malicious peer could trigger a crash by returning a crafted inclusion proof with a length mismatch. Patches The patch for this vulnerability is included as part of v1.3.0. Workarounds No known workarounds know.

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-264v-m8fm-76jm

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-34067

Advisory: nimiq-transaction: Panic via `HistoryTreeProof` length mismatch
IDs: CVE-2026-34067, GHSA-264v-m8fm-76jm
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-34067 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:42 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Low (CVSS 3.1)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- crates.io nimiq-transaction: affected <= 0.2.0

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- crates.io nimiq-transaction: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on nimiq-transaction.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-264v-m8fm-76jm (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-264v-m8fm-76jm lists affected ranges: crates.io nimiq-transaction >=0 <=0.2.0)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…