A PinchTab Security Policy Bypass in /wait Allows Arbitrary JavaScript Execution
CVE-2026-33622GHSA-w5pc-m664-r62v
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab
- Affected
- >= 0.8.3
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/cmd/pinchtab
- Affected
- >= 0.8.3, <= 0.8.5
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-w5pc-m664-r62v lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/cmd/pinchtab >=0.8.3 =0.8.3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 6.1 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-33622: 0.53% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 45.01 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary PinchTab v0.8.3 through v0.8.5 allow arbitrary JavaScript execution through POST /wait and POST /tabs/{id}/wait when the request uses fn mode, even if security.allowEvaluate is disabled. POST /evaluate correctly enforces the security.allowEvaluate guard, which is disabled by default. However, in the affected releases, POST /wait accepted a user-controlled fn expression, embedded it directly into executable JavaScript, and evaluated it in the browser context without checking the same policy. This is a security-policy bypass rather than a separate authentication bypass. Exploitation still requires authenticated API access, but a caller with the server token can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a tab context even when the operator explicitly disabled JavaScript evaluation. The current worktree fixes this by applying the same policy boundary to fn mode in /wait that already exists on /evaluate, while preserving the non-code wait modes. Details Issue 1 — /evaluate enforced the…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-w5pc-m664-r62v
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-33622 Advisory: A PinchTab Security Policy Bypass in /wait Allows Arbitrary JavaScript Execution IDs: CVE-2026-33622, GHSA-w5pc-m664-r62v Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-33622 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.1) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab: affected >= 0.8.3 - Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/cmd/pinchtab: affected >= 0.8.3, <= 0.8.5 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab: check the installed version with your package manager. - Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/cmd/pinchtab: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab, github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/cmd/pinchtab. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w5pc-m664-r62v (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-w5pc-m664-r62v lists affected ranges: Go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/cmd/pinchtab >=0.8.3 =0.8.3) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…