Craft CMS' anonymous "assets/image-editor" calls return private asset editor metadata to unauthorized users
CVE-2026-33161GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (craftcms/cms 5.9.14, 4.17.8), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist craftcms/cms
- Affected
- >= 5.0.0-RC1, <= 5.9.13>= 4.0.0-RC1, <= 4.17.7
- Fixed in
- 5.9.14, 4.17.8
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2 lists affected ranges: Packagist craftcms/cms >=5.0.0-RC1 =4.0.0-RC1 <=4.17.7
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 1.3 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-33161: 0.22% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 12.50 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary A low-privileged authenticated user can call assets/image-editor with the ID of a private asset they cannot view and still receive editor response data, including focalPoint. The endpoint returns private editing metadata without per-asset authorization validation. Root-cause analysis: 1. actionImageEditor() accepts assetId from the request body. 2. The asset is loaded, and the focal-point data is read. 3. Response returns html and focalPoint. 4. No explicit authorization check is applied before the response. Impact Affected deployments: Craft sites where asset edit metadata should remain restricted to authorized users. Security consequence: Unauthorized users can extract private editor metadata and related editor context for inaccessible assets.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-33161 Advisory: Craft CMS' anonymous "assets/image-editor" calls return private asset editor metadata to unauthorized users IDs: CVE-2026-33161, GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-33161 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Low (CVSS 1.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: craftcms/cms 5.9.14, 4.17.8. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist craftcms/cms: affected >= 5.0.0-RC1, <= 5.9.13; >= 4.0.0-RC1, <= 4.17.7; fixed in 5.9.14, 4.17.8 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist craftcms/cms: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on craftcms/cms. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2 lists affected ranges: Packagist craftcms/cms >=5.0.0-RC1 =4.0.0-RC1 <=4.17.7) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…