Skip to content

← Actionable
Low, CVSS 1.7

Craft Commerce has an unauthenticated information disclosure that can leak some customer order data on anonymous payments

CVE-2026-32270GHSA-3vxg-x5f8-f5qf

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (craftcms/commerce 5.6.0, 4.11.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • Packagist craftcms/commerce

    Affected
    >= 5.0.0, <= 5.5.4>= 4.0.0, <= 4.10.2
    Fixed in
    5.6.0, 4.11.0

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS 4.0
1.7 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U · score source
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-32270: 0.29% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 22.19 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Summary PaymentsController::actionPay discloses some order data to unauthenticated users when an order number is provided and the email check fails during an anonymous payment. The JSON error response includes the serialized order object (order), which contains some sensitive fields such as customer email, shipping address, and billing address. Details I manually audited frontend payment flows and found that actionPay() retrieves orders by number before authorization is fully enforced. Code path: 1. Load order by number. 2. Evaluate whether payment is authorized for completed orders (number + matching email). 3. If unauthorized, return failure. 4. Failure response still includes cartArray($order), which serializes sensitive order data. Why is this a vulnerability? - Authorization logic says the requester is not allowed to pay for a completed order without an email. - But the response still returns the same completed order’s contents. Impact Type: Information Disclosure / Broken…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-3vxg-x5f8-f5qf

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-32270

Advisory: Craft Commerce has an unauthenticated information disclosure that can leak some customer order data on anonymous payments
IDs: CVE-2026-32270, GHSA-3vxg-x5f8-f5qf
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-32270 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Low (CVSS 1.7)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: craftcms/commerce 5.6.0, 4.11.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- Packagist craftcms/commerce: affected >= 5.0.0, <= 5.5.4; >= 4.0.0, <= 4.10.2; fixed in 5.6.0, 4.11.0

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- Packagist craftcms/commerce: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on craftcms/commerce.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3vxg-x5f8-f5qf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-3vxg-x5f8-f5qf lists affected ranges: Packagist craftcms/commerce >=5.0.0 =4.0.0 <=4.10.2)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…