Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 5.3amended

Uptime Kuma is Missing Authorization Checks on Ping Badge Endpoint, Leaks Ping times of monitors without needing to be on a status page

CVE-2026-32230GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (uptime-kuma 2.2.0), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS
5.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-32230: 0.92% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 60.49 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

Summary The GET /api/badge/:id/ping/:duration? endpoint in server/routers/api-router.js does not verify that the requested monitor belongs to a public group. All other badge endpoints check AND public = 1 in their SQL query before returning data. The ping endpoint skips this check entirely, allowing unauthenticated users to extract average ping/response time data for private monitors. Affected Code File: server/routers/api-router.js, approximately line 304 The ping badge endpoint directly calls UptimeCalculator.getUptimeCalculator(requestedMonitorId) without first checking if the monitor is public. Compare with the status badge endpoint (~line 148) which correctly queries: Protected vs Vulnerable Endpoints | Endpoint | Has public=1 check? | |----------|-------------------| | /api/badge/:id/status | Yes | | /api/badge/:id/uptime/:duration? | Yes | | /api/badge/:id/avg-response/:duration? | Yes | | /api/badge/:id/cert-exp | Yes | | /api/badge/:id/response | Yes | |…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 2 · amended ·

    Amended from ghsa record GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h

  2. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from osv record GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-32230

Advisory: Uptime Kuma is Missing Authorization Checks on Ping Badge Endpoint, Leaks Ping times of monitors without needing to be on a status page
IDs: CVE-2026-32230, GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-32230 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:46 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.3)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: uptime-kuma 2.2.0. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- npm uptime-kuma: affected >= 2.0.0, <= 2.1.3; fixed in 2.2.0

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- `npm ls uptime-kuma --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on uptime-kuma.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h (OSV record GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h lists affected ranges: npm uptime-kuma >=2.0.0 <2.2.0 (fixed))
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-c7hf-c5p5-5g6h lists affected ranges: npm uptime-kuma >=2.0.0 <=2.1.3)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…