APScheduler's JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Insecure Deserialization
CVE-2026-31072GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI apscheduler
- Affected
- >= 4.0.0a1, <= 4.0.0a6
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 lists affected ranges: PyPI apscheduler >=4.0.0a1 <=4.0.0a6
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 lists affected ranges: PyPI apscheduler >=4.0.0a1 <=4.0.0a6
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 9.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-31072: 0.81% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 56.95 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
The JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer in APScheduler (all versions including 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Insecure Deserialization. The unmarshal_object function allows for arbitrary class instantiation and state injection by dynamically importing modules and calling setstate on any class available in the Python environment. An attacker can exploit this by submitting a specially crafted JSON or CBOR payload to an application using these serializers
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 5 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
- Revision 4 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from osv record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-31072 Advisory: APScheduler's JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Insecure Deserialization IDs: CVE-2026-31072, GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-31072 (revision 5, source checked 28 Oct 2026, 06:10 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI apscheduler: affected >= 4.0.0a1, <= 4.0.0a6 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show apscheduler`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on apscheduler. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 lists affected ranges: PyPI apscheduler >=4.0.0a1 <=4.0.0a6) - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 (OSV record GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7 lists affected ranges: PyPI apscheduler >=4.0.0a1 <=4.0.0a6) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…