OpenClaw Telegram allowlist authorization accepted mutable usernames
CVE-2026-28480GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf
What to do
Partial vendor fix. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
npm openclaw
- Affected
- < 2026.2.14
- Fixed in
- 2026.2.14
npm clawdbot
- Affected
- <= 2026.1.24-3
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf lists affected ranges: npm openclaw >=0 =0 <=2026.1.24-3
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf lists affected ranges: npm openclaw >=0 =0 <=2026.1.24-3
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS 4.0
- 6.9 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N · score source
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-28480: 0.24% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 15.64 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary Telegram allowlist authorization could match on @username (mutable/recyclable) instead of immutable numeric sender IDs. Impact Operators who treat Telegram allowlists as strict identity controls could unintentionally grant access if a username changes hands (identity rebinding/spoof risk). This can allow an unauthorized sender to interact with the bot in allowlist mode. Affected Packages / Versions - npm openclaw: <= 2026.2.13 - npm clawdbot: <= 2026.1.24-3 Fix Telegram allowlist authorization now requires numeric Telegram sender IDs only. @username allowlist principals are rejected. A security audit warning was added to flag legacy configs that still contain non-numeric Telegram allowlist entries. openclaw doctor --fix now attempts to resolve @username allowFrom entries to numeric IDs (best-effort; requires a Telegram bot token). Fix Commit(s) - e3b432e481a96b8fd41b91273818e514074e05c3 - 9e147f00b48e63e7be6964e0e2a97f2980854128 Thanks @vincentkoc for reporting.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 3 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Reviewed OSV alias/range/CVSS4 correction; package source scopes and original publication preserved. No customer finding resolved.
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-28480 Advisory: OpenClaw Telegram allowlist authorization accepted mutable usernames IDs: CVE-2026-28480, GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-28480 (revision 3, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 12:43 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.9) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Partial vendor fix; fixed versions by package: openclaw 2026.2.14. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - npm openclaw: affected < 2026.2.14; fixed in 2026.2.14 - npm clawdbot: affected <= 2026.1.24-3 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `npm ls openclaw --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. - `npm ls clawdbot --all`: lists every installed copy and version, including transitive ones. Run in the project root after `npm ci`. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on openclaw, clawdbot. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf (OSV record GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf lists affected ranges: npm openclaw >=0 =0 <=2026.1.24-3) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf lists affected ranges: npm openclaw >=0 =0 <=2026.1.24-3) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…