wger: IDOR in RepetitionsConfig and MaxRepetitionsConfig API leak other users' workout data
CVE-2026-27835GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI wger
- Affected
- <= 2.1
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 4.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-27835: 0.29% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 22.23 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Summary RepetitionsConfigViewSet and MaxRepetitionsConfigViewSet return all users' repetition config data because their getqueryset() calls .all() instead of filtering by the authenticated user. Any registered user can enumerate every other user's workout structure. Details wger/manager/api/views.py:499 and :518: Every sibling viewset in the same file correctly filters by user. For example, WeightConfigViewSet at line 459: The same user filter is present on SetsConfig, RestConfig, RiRConfig, and their Max variants — only RepetitionsConfig and MaxRepetitionsConfig are missing it. PoC Registration is open by default. Sequential IDs allow full enumeration. Impact Any authenticated user can read other users' repetition and max-repetitions configs, exposing workout structure (slot entry IDs, iteration values, operations, step counts, repeat flags, requirements JSON). This is a broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerability — the same class of issue as OWASP API1. Fix: Add the…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-27835 Advisory: wger: IDOR in RepetitionsConfig and MaxRepetitionsConfig API leak other users' workout data IDs: CVE-2026-27835, GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-27835 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 4.3) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI wger: affected <= 2.1 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show wger`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on wger. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm (OSV record GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-xf68-8hjw-7mpm lists affected ranges: PyPI wger >=0 <=2.1) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…