Skip to content

← Actionable
Medium, CVSS 6.9

Wasmtime is vulnerable to panic when dropping a [Typed]Func::call_async future

CVE-2026-27195GHSA-xjhv-v822-pf94

What to do

Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (wasmtime 41.0.4, 40.0.4), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.

This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.

Affected packages

  • crates.io wasmtime

    Affected
    >= 39.0.0, < 40.0.4>= 41.0.0, < 41.0.4
    Fixed in
    41.0.4, 40.0.4

Sources

Severity and exploitation
Exploitation
No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
CVSS 4.0
6.9 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H · score source
EPSS
  • CVE-2026-27195: 0.41% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 35.50 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description

As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.

The affected versions of Wasmtime can panic if the host embedder drops the future returned by wasmtime::component::[Typed]Func::callasync before it resolves. Details Starting with Wasmtime 39.0.0, the component-model-async feature became the default, which brought with it a new implementation of [Typed]Func::callasync which made it capable of calling async-typed guest export functions. However, that implementation had a bug leading to a panic under certain circumstances: 1. The host embedding calls [Typed]Func::callasync on a function exported by a component, polling the returned Future once. 2. The component function yields control to the async runtime (e.g. Tokio), e.g. due to a call to host function registered using LinkerInstance::funcwrapasync which yields, or due an epoch interruption. 3. The host embedding drops the Future after polling it once. This leaves the component instance in a non-reenterable state since the call never had a chance to complete. 4. The host embedding…

Dates and revisions
Published by the source
Last modified by the source
Source last checked
  1. Revision 1 · created ·

    Published from ghsa record GHSA-xjhv-v822-pf94

Agent brief

Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.

# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-27195

Advisory: Wasmtime is vulnerable to panic when dropping a `[Typed]Func::call_async` future
IDs: CVE-2026-27195, GHSA-xjhv-v822-pf94
Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-27195 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 15:42 UTC)
Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 6.9)
Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV.
Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: wasmtime 41.0.4, 40.0.4. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed.

## Affected components
- crates.io wasmtime: affected >= 39.0.0, < 40.0.4; >= 41.0.0, < 41.0.4; fixed in 41.0.4, 40.0.4

## Suggested inspection (read-only)
- crates.io wasmtime: check the installed version with your package manager.

## Supported action
Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version.

## Required regression checks
- Run the test suite and a production build.
- Exercise the features that depend on wasmtime.
- Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed.

## Rollback considerations
- Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward.

## Unresolved questions
- Which deployments run an affected version?
- Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority.
- Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production.

## Sources
- Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xjhv-v822-pf94 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-xjhv-v822-pf94 lists affected ranges: crates.io wasmtime >=39.0.0 =41.0.0 <41.0.4)

Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.

Loading voting…