Moodle has a Remote Code Execution risk via file restore
CVE-2026-26045GHSA-ggxq-2mg9-8966
What to do
Vendor fix available. Upgrade each affected package to the fixed version on its release line (moodle/moodle 5.1.2, 5.0.5, 4.5.9), redeploy, then verify what is actually installed.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
Packagist moodle/moodle
- Affected
- >= 5.1.0-beta, < 5.1.2>= 5.0.0-beta, < 5.0.5< 4.5.9
- Fixed in
- 5.0.5, 4.5.9, 5.1.2
Sources
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-ggxq-2mg9-8966 lists affected ranges: Packagist moodle/moodle >=5.1.0-beta =5.0.0-beta =0 <4.5.9
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 7.2 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-26045: 0.64% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 50.82 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
A flaw was identified in Moodle’s backup restore functionality where specially crafted backup files were not properly validated during processing. If a malicious backup file is restored, it could lead to unintended execution of server-side code. Since restore capabilities are typically available to privileged users, exploitation requires authenticated access. Successful exploitation could result in full compromise of the Moodle server.
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from ghsa record GHSA-ggxq-2mg9-8966
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-26045 Advisory: Moodle has a Remote Code Execution risk via file restore IDs: CVE-2026-26045, GHSA-ggxq-2mg9-8966 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-26045 (revision 1, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: High (CVSS 7.2) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor fix available; fixed versions by package: moodle/moodle 5.1.2, 5.0.5, 4.5.9. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - Packagist moodle/moodle: affected >= 5.1.0-beta, < 5.1.2; >= 5.0.0-beta, < 5.0.5; < 4.5.9; fixed in 5.0.5, 4.5.9, 5.1.2 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - Packagist moodle/moodle: check the installed version with your package manager. ## Supported action Upgrade each affected component to a fixed version on its release line. For a transitive dependency, upgrade the parent package or add an override or constraint, then regenerate the lockfile. Redeploy every environment that ran an affected version. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on moodle/moodle. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-ggxq-2mg9-8966 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-ggxq-2mg9-8966 lists affected ranges: Packagist moodle/moodle >=5.1.0-beta =5.0.0-beta =0 <4.5.9) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…