MCP Run Python has a Sandbox Escape & Server Takeover Vulnerability
CVE-2026-25905GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6
What to do
Vendor response not established. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check back for a fix.
This page has no inventory attached, so it cannot say whether you are affected. A vendor fix is not proof that your deployment is fixed.
Affected packages
PyPI mcp-run-python
- Affected
- <= 0.0.22
- Fixed in
- no fixed version recorded
Sources
- Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV.dev), including the GitHub Advisory Database
OSV record GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-run-python >=0 <=0.0.22
VerifiedObserved Structured OSV record; GitHub-reviewed advisory.
- GitHub Advisory Database and maintainer security advisories on GitHub
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-run-python >=0 <=0.0.22
VerifiedObserved Structured GitHub Advisory Database record (type=reviewed) from the GitHub REST API.
Severity and exploitation
- Exploitation
- No confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next marks exploitation only from CISA KEV.
- CVSS
- 5.8 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
- EPSS
- CVE-2026-25905: 0.21% estimated exploitation activity in the next 30 days; percentile 10.80 (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-03). This is a model estimate, not proof of exploitation or customer exposure.
Source description
As published by the source; long descriptions are shortened.
Impact Critical Sandbox Escape & Server Takeover: A critical security vulnerability exists in mcp-run-python due to a lack of isolation between the Python runtime (Pyodide) and the host JavaScript environment. The runPython and runPythonAsync functions execute Python code using Pyodide without restricting access to the JavaScript bridge. This allows any executed Python code—whether from a user or an AI model—to access the js module in Pyodide. Through this bridge, the Python code can modify the global JavaScript environment, interact with the Node.js process, and alter the behavior of the MCP server. Specific Attack Vector: MCP Tool Shadowing Because the Python code can modify the JS runtime, an attacker can dynamically overwrite or "shadow" existing MCP tools registered on the server. For example, an attacker could replace a secure file-reading tool with a malicious version that exfiltrates data to an external server, all while the MCP server appears to be functioning normally.…
Dates and revisions
- Published by the source
- Last modified by the source
- Source last checked
- Revision 2 · amended ·
Amended from ghsa record GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6
- Revision 1 · created ·
Published from osv record GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6
Agent brief
Preview the exact text before you copy it. Commands are read-only suggestions; review them before running anything.
# Patch Next advisory brief: CVE-2026-25905 Advisory: MCP Run Python has a Sandbox Escape & Server Takeover Vulnerability IDs: CVE-2026-25905, GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 Record: https://patchnext.com/advisories/cve-2026-25905 (revision 2, source checked 26 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC) Inventory: none attached. This brief comes from a public page and does not say whether any deployment is affected. Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.8) Exploitation: no confirmed exploitation recorded. Patch Next confirms exploitation only from CISA KEV. Vendor response: Vendor response not established. A vendor fix does not mean a deployment is fixed. ## Affected components - PyPI mcp-run-python: affected <= 0.0.22 ## Suggested inspection (read-only) - `python -m pip show mcp-run-python`: prints the installed version. Run with the environment that serves production active. ## Supported action No complete vendor fix is recorded. Follow the primary source's mitigation guidance and check this record again before closing anything. ## Required regression checks - Run the test suite and a production build. - Exercise the features that depend on mcp-run-python. - Repeat the inspection and confirm that only fixed versions remain installed. ## Rollback considerations - Keep the previous lockfile and deployment artifact. Rolling back reinstates the vulnerable version, so apply any documented mitigation while you fix forward. ## Unresolved questions - Which deployments run an affected version? - Exploitation status can change. Check again before lowering the priority. - Mark the work resolved only after the fixed version is verified in production. ## Sources - Verified: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 (OSV record GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-run-python >=0 <=0.0.22) - Verified: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 (GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-pfv4-wmph-5gc6 lists affected ranges: PyPI mcp-run-python >=0 <=0.0.22) Commands are suggestions: review each one before running it.
Loading voting…